Is wikipedia a credible and valid

An editor who is biased against or for the work may add unsourced personal opinion. If a book is in your university library or published by a reputable university pressor if an article is in a standard academic journalthat means that several professors at some point have considered the information and considered it worthy to publish.

Wikipedia is ideal in these situations because it will allow you to find the information, as well as sources which you can research to confirm that information.

It is even possible that a person might introduce completely made-up, false information as a hoax. Research from these sources will be more detailed, more precise, more carefully reasoned, and more broadly peer reviewed than the summary you found in an encyclopedia.

Even with Featured Articles, though, an uninformed editor may introduce incorrect information. Infor example, slanderous comments were added to U.

Although when an error is recognized, it is usually fixed. Credible Research Source or Not. Follow Natalie Wolchover on Twitter nattyover.

Article sizeand Wikipedia: And even the most neutral writer is sometimes guilty of not being fully objective. However, because Wikipedia cannot monitor thousands of edits made everyday, some of those edits could contain vandalism or could be simply wrong and left unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years.

It is Wikipedia's Featured Articles that are especially trustworthy in contrast to normal or even good articles, as they have to pass even more rigorous "tests" to become featured, as they are to be "the best of Wikipedia", "a model for other articles", and thus, a more reliable source than average articles.

Some information even appeared to have been added to the page by companies or organizations in search of publicity.

Editorial judgment goes into each decision about whether or not to create a separate page, but the decision should always be based upon specific considerations about how to make the topic understandable, and not merely upon personal likes or dislikes.

The capital city of Canada.

WriteCheck Blog

In that case, a viable option is creating a new list or category for the broader topic and linking to the individual articles from it as with Category: Article sizeand Wikipedia: Sometimes, understanding is best achieved by presenting the material on a dedicated standalone page, but it is not required that we do so.

Some details, such as the population of Canadacan be found on Wikipedia, but it is best to verify the information using an authoritative source, such as the CIA World Factbook. Citation is not needed for fact-checking general knowledge. If there is no source cited, consider a different method of obtaining this information.

Remember that any encyclopedia is a starting point for research, not an ending point.

Wikipedia:Academic use

Follow two simple rules: However, because Wikipedia cannot monitor thousands of edits made everyday, some of those edits could contain vandalism or could be simply wrong and left unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. Higher learning institutions do not consider Wikipedia as a credible or valid source for gathering information.

A group of students entering the MBA program and the University Of Phoenix was tasked to debate whether Wikipedia is a creditable and valid source of information. Abstract Team A debated on whether Wikipedia is a credible and valid source of information.

The team was divided into two groups, one side for and one side against. Among the five team members only one (the author) sided for Wikipedia as a credible and valid source. Wikipedia is an overview of information; it’s general and written for the general public.

Even if you were to use a print Encyclopedia, you would still not be approaching your writing from an. Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything, and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.

However, citation of Wikipedia in research papers may be. On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article.

Wikipedia's concept of notability applies this basic standard to avoid indiscriminate inclusion of topics. Management July 25, Is Wikipedia a Credible and Valid Source of Information?

Wikipedia:Academic use

Abstract Team A debated on whether Wikipedia is a credible and valid source of information. The team was divided into two groups, one side for and one side against.

Is wikipedia a credible and valid
Rated 4/5 based on 16 review
Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia